Rush

[Rabbit]

In Battlefield 3 there is rush and I think it could go great at the Airhouse. If you don't know what Rush is I will post a link later today.

[Boomer]

I think this would be a great game! However, the rush maps are huge, we might not be able to fit 4-6 bases at the Airhouse.

Rush: It is a game type where the attackers must take control of a base while the defending team keeps the base, well, defended. Once the base is over run the defenders must fall back to the next base. If the defender is dead they will re-spawn at the current base only. If the defender is alive they must fight till death or retreat back to the new base. Once the attackers take control of a new base they will re-spawn there until they take another new base. The defenders win if they hold off the attackers for a set amount of time. The attackers win if they capture all the bases within the set amount of time. To control a base the attackers must plant 2 bombs at set spots around the base.

A few things we would need to change is the amount of bases, switch to 1 bomb instead of 2. Also set a realistic time frame for the game to be played. I think 10-15 minutes per base would be fine.



This is a standard Rush map. The blue boxes are attackers spawns and the red boxes are the bombs. Once the base is over run the next area opens up. This would be hard to do at the Airhouse but if we make a few rules about attackers camping the next base it should be fine.

[chris]

Hmmmmm as a fellow battle field fan that would be sweet.

[Slappy]

As someone who has never played battlefield, this seems pretty complicated to bring onto the airsoft field!

[magnus30091]

looks fun.

[Boomer]

It would be a very fun game to play but it's requires a large space with areas for the defenders to fall back to once they lose the base. It would work better as a MilSim, to make it work at the Airhouse it would require a lot of adjusting.

How I would do it.
First base is inside, both teams spawn on each side of the Airhouse. Once the game starts the attackers rush the defenders side. The defenders can't pass a certain point. Once the lose the base and both bombs where planted the defenders fall back to the outside where they can defend.

Problems.
I can see the defenders running outside to defend while the dead defenders walk out there to re-spawn. While doing this the attackers will also be charging the outside, so the few if any defenders must hold off the attackers while the dead re-spawn. So by the time the dead defenders get to their new base to re-spawn the attackers are kicking in their door and shoving their guns if their face.

Solution.
Attackers should have to stand at the old base until told by a Ref to move on and start attacking.

[Raider]

I think that this is a great idea! however i agree there isn't quite enough space for this game type at the Airhouse.

[Boomer]

May 22, 2012 17:44:40 GMT -5 Raider said:

I think that this is a great idea! however i agree there isn't quite enough space for this game type at the Airhouse.

There would be enough room if the amount of bases are lowered and there are rules on the attackers preventing camping the un-spawned base.

[Rabbit]

^ Exactly!

[magnus30091]

i would play it.

[Shadsquatch]

Easy rules. 1 team is inside. 1 is outside. Bases (2) are on one of the inside. Attackers spawn on the other side. The attackers can't go outside until the Mcoms are destroyed. The second Set of objectives are in the middle outside. The attackers cant go past them into enemy spawn points. Neither spawn points move at all. The Attackers can only go outside on the opposite side of their spawn.

[Arch-Angel(3.14)]

I honestly don't think there is enough space for this at the airhouse.

[Boomer]

May 23, 2012 20:49:37 GMT -5 Arch-Angel(3.14) said:

I honestly don't think there is enough space for this at the airhouse.

If we can have at least 2 bases then we are all set. Other wise it's just a game of S&D....

[chris]

This is definitely a test before try game.

[shad0whunt3r721]

If it works out this will be awesome!